From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:05:47 +0200 Message-ID: <838vogt1tw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <68A313A7DDAA4912A255DAFE495606F9@us.oracle.com> <24FDB65B0E784E978085D30A7CBF9FAF@us.oracle.com> <8362jlv0rq.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwipgltl.fsf@gnu.org> <83pqhtt144.fsf@gnu.org> <4E9FD232.9090502@cs.ucla.edu> <83botct3qv.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319105230 25859 80.91.229.12 (20 Oct 2011 10:07:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, 9794@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Oct 20 12:07:06 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpWi-00075W-Hw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:07:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35115 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpWh-0003pB-8M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:07:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47508) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpWd-0003p5-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:07:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpWY-0004gb-Od for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:06:59 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:43201) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpWY-0004gX-N8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpXe-0005nd-AF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:08:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9794.131910525022254 (code B ref 9794); Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Oct 2011 10:07:30 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpX8-0005mt-EV for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:07:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGpX7-0005mf-14 for 9794@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:07:29 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTC00K00ZX4RW00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 9794@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:05:48 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTD00KSK01KRU00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Thu, 20 Oct 2011 12:05:48 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 06:08:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52911 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Schwab > Cc: Paul Eggert , 9794@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:46:06 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > Fixed how? Given some arbitrary string, how can Lisp code check > > whether it is or isn't compliant? > > By using %z. That's _after_ you discover that the string returned by %Z is non-compliant. My question was ho to discover that, sorry for being unclear.