From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16022: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: <838uw35ig5.fsf@gnu.org> References: <6f06fa69-315a-4e8d-aa24-400a0ded5ed8@default> <83eh5w5mzi.fsf@gnu.org> <529C38F8.9080803@gmx.at> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386001573 29421 80.91.229.3 (2 Dec 2013 16:26:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2013 16:26:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16022@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 02 17:26:17 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWK7-0001ca-Gt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 17:26:15 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37604 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWK7-0004rO-4X for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:26:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35087) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWK0-0004rI-3U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:26:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWJv-0005oV-Ep for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:26:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:40849) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWJv-0005oR-BI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:26:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWJu-0003n6-Gr for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:26:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:26:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16022 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 16022-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16022.138600151514508 (code B ref 16022); Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:26:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16022) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Dec 2013 16:25:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54866 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWJ8-0003lv-B2 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:25:14 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42995) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VnWJ2-0003lZ-Iw for 16022@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 11:25:10 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MX600I00TL8JP00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16022@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:25:01 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MX600IBPTLMJJ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 02 Dec 2013 18:24:59 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <529C38F8.9080803@gmx.at> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81259 Archived-At: > Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 08:38:32 +0100 > From: martin rudalics > CC: Drew Adams , 16022@debbugs.gnu.org > > >> This looks like a different backtrace from others I've gotten recently. > > > > Yes, it's different. > > > > w32_backtrace at c:\msys\home\dani\emacs\build\src/../../repo/src/w32fns.c:7958 > > emacs_abort at c:\msys\home\dani\emacs\build\src/../../repo/src/w32fns.c:7990 > > terminate_due_to_signal at c:\msys\home\dani\emacs\build\src/../../repo/src/emacs.c:377 > > die at c:\msys\home\dani\emacs\build\src/../../repo/src/alloc.c:6726 > > row_equal_p at c:\msys\home\dani\emacs\build\src/../../repo/src/dispnew.c:1168 > > Is this after my pixelwise change? Relax, it's from before your changes.