From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#10304: 24.0.92: display bug Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:42:50 +0200 Message-ID: <838uiuau85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8762hihrj7.fsf@live.com> <8362gnhp9b.fsf@gnu.org> <8338yfamvk.fsf@gnu.org> <83wqvr8rci.fsf@gnu.org> <83ehhw8c15.fsf@gnu.org> <831tp5ixns.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1417275868 2862 80.91.229.3 (29 Nov 2014 15:44:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:44:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 29 16:44:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XukC2-0002GE-Ha for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 16:44:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47984 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XukC2-0003rH-6x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:44:18 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36701) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XukBs-0003ph-IW for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:44:14 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XukBm-0003n8-Op for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:52114) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XukBm-0003n4-Kq for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:44:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XukBm-0004ti-6p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:44:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 10304 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 10304-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B10304.141727578518746 (code B ref 10304); Sat, 29 Nov 2014 15:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 10304) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Nov 2014 15:43:05 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49327 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XukAm-0004rw-Tk for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:43:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:51389) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XukAe-0004rh-Qr for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 10:42:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NFT00G004QGYK00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 10304@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:42:50 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NFT00GQP4ZEXP10@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Sat, 29 Nov 2014 17:42:50 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:96730 Archived-At: > From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 10304@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 16:41:23 +0100 > > Ok, here are the two new traces. The first one is when everything is OK. Sorry for a long delay. Unfortunately, I cannot match either of your two images with the corresponding dump of the glyph matrix: there are small inconsistencies in both the "OK" and the "not OK" cases. For example, the first image shows "Top L1" in the mode line of the window that displays the article, but the matrix dump says: 68: (1) ' 1:--- . news:g.c.w.arnoldzwicky Austenian humbleb... Top L19 (Article) ' which is line 19. This is a minor discrepancy, but since there are many similar discrepancies, some of which are probably parts of the bug, I feel I have no firm ground from which I can begin studying the data and making hypotheses about what went wrong. Could you please produce 2 sets of screenshot+matrix dump which are coherent with each other? I must be sure that when I see a discrepancy, it is part of the bug, not some artifact that needs to be ignored. Also, I don't understand the second screenshot: which parts of it are correct and which are bogus? The text before the image looks unfinished, but its continuation, starting with screen line 20, which is clearly present in the glyph matrix dump, is not shown. Are you saying that Emacs was supposed to display that continuation, but never did, and instead left the old parts on display? Thanks.