From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#19547: 25.0.50; throw-on-input "fires" when switching workspace Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:43:42 +0200 Message-ID: <838ugyxgk1.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874ms03qj1.fsf@web.de> <87zj9r4i8d.fsf@web.de> <87sifj4e9j.fsf@web.de> <83egr36ltc.fsf@gnu.org> <87oaq6l1ea.fsf@web.de> <87oapudv8e.fsf@web.de> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1421725452 24571 80.91.229.3 (20 Jan 2015 03:44:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:44:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 19547@debbugs.gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 20 04:44:11 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjf-00020O-BM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 04:44:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPje-00024k-6r for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57606) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPja-00024f-VT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjX-0008Dw-PI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:06 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59735) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjX-0008Ds-Ls for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjX-0007A6-5K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:44:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 19547 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 19547-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B19547.142172544127515 (code B ref 19547); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:44:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 19547) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Jan 2015 03:44:01 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50194 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjV-00079i-DU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:44:01 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout29.012.net.il ([80.179.55.185]:44867) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1YDPjR-00079P-8Q for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 19 Jan 2015 22:43:58 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout29.012.net.il by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NIG00B00HBO3K00@mtaout29.012.net.il> for 19547@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:40:30 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by mtaout29.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NIG0045YI7I7B90@mtaout29.012.net.il>; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 05:40:30 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <87oapudv8e.fsf@web.de> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:98489 Archived-At: > From: Michael Heerdegen > Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 03:46:57 +0100 > > Stefan Monnier writes: > > > > && event->kind != FOCUS_OUT_EVENT > > > && event->kind != ICONIFY_EVENT > > > > Adding FOCUS_OUT_EVENT seems definitely safe since we already handle > > FOCUS_IN_EVENT like that. As for ICONIFY_EVENT, it seems a bit more > > risky, but I think we can give it a try. > > Eli, would that change be acceptable in your eyes? I don't see any immediate problems, but then I'm not an expert on GUI events. So I agree with Stefan: let's try.