From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#20611: 24.4; mutt slow in ansi-term Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 05:41:06 +0300 Message-ID: <838u0ifcxp.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a8x1roby.fsf@apollo.hindleynet> <8737qwvuo3.fsf@mbork.pl> <20160409073937.GH1897@hindley.org.uk> <83mvp3i0l1.fsf@gnu.org> <20160410091526.GA25798@hindley.org.uk> <83d1pxgzy6.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuut2jfy.fsf@gmail.com> <83y48kf838.fsf@gnu.org> <87shyrntpm.fsf@gmail.com> <83lh4ig83z.fsf@gnu.org> <87inzml5n2.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1460515404 12984 80.91.229.3 (13 Apr 2016 02:43:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: mark@hindley.org.uk, mbork@mbork.pl, 20611@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alexis Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 13 04:43:13 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAls-0006Ea-Qn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 13 Apr 2016 04:43:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34262 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAlp-0003cn-7W for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34450) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAll-0003aR-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAli-0001nP-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:49054) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAli-0001nL-4p for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAlh-00018W-TH for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:43:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:43:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 20611 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 20611-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B20611.14605153294309 (code B ref 20611); Wed, 13 Apr 2016 02:43:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 20611) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Apr 2016 02:42:09 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33158 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAkr-00017Q-8k for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:42:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAko-000171-QU for 20611@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:42:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAkg-0001A5-HD for 20611@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:42:01 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAkJ-0000wr-4I; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:41:35 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:3913 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aqAkI-00066S-Aj; Tue, 12 Apr 2016 22:41:34 -0400 In-reply-to: <87inzml5n2.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alexis on Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:22:09 +1000) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:116426 Archived-At: > From: Alexis > Cc: mark@hindley.org.uk, 20611@debbugs.gnu.org, mbork@mbork.pl > Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 10:22:09 +1000 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > If in Emacs 24 or 25 you set bidi-display-reordering to nil in > > the *ansi-term* buffer, do you see any significant speedup? > > i do, in both; with `bidi-display-reordering' set to nil, i don't > notice any significant lag in either version. How about leaving bidi-display-reordering at its default, and instead setting bidi-paragraph-direction to left-to-right?