From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#25154: 25.1; Bindings in cl-letf are in reverse order Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 20:27:40 +0200 Message-ID: <838trnfxlv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8737hwllow.fsf@gmail.com> <83zik4fdug.fsf@gnu.org> <87bmwjy80b.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1481394507 29125 195.159.176.226 (10 Dec 2016 18:28:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 18:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 25154@debbugs.gnu.org To: Alex Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 10 19:28:12 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNY-000599-JZ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 19:28:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52727 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNc-00074E-2J for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:28:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60556) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNR-00072u-PT for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:28:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNO-0004Sm-Ki for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:28:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:50057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNO-0004Sb-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:28:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmNO-0005lC-9E for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:28:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 18:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 25154 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug Original-Received: via spool by 25154-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B25154.148139445622103 (code B ref 25154); Sat, 10 Dec 2016 18:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 25154) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2016 18:27:36 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37223 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmMy-0005kR-36 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:27:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41274) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmMw-0005kD-0z for 25154@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:27:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmMn-0004Oc-LO for 25154@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:27:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34853) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmMn-0004OY-I1; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:27:25 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1734 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1cFmMk-0001Rt-OP; Sat, 10 Dec 2016 13:27:25 -0500 In-reply-to: <87bmwjy80b.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Alex on Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:05:40 -0600) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:126823 Archived-At: > From: Alex > Cc: 25154@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 12:05:40 -0600 > > > Isn't it true that the order of evaluation in a 'let' is unspecified? > > If you want a particular order, use 'let*'. > > I don't think so. See (info "(elisp) Local Variables"): > > All of the VALUE-FORMs in BINDINGS are evaluated in the order they > appear That's the evaluation order. Your code relies on the order of _binding_ variables to values, which is unspecified. Contrast the above with the description of 'let*' below it.