From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
Cc: 26126@debbugs.gnu.org, politza@hochschule-trier.de
Subject: bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 17:44:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <838tnx71u0.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8737e54f8c.fsf@detlef> (message from Michael Albinus on Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:23:47 +0100)
> From: Michael Albinus <michael.albinus@gmx.de>
> Cc: politza@hochschule-trier.de, 26126@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2017 14:23:47 +0100
>
> > But Andreas asks about calling remote handlers, about which we by
> > definition know much less.
>
> Nope. We know exactly which remote handlers are called, and how they
> behave.
We know that about our handlers, yes. But that doesn't have to be the
end of the story. Emacs is extensible.
> Do you expect other implementations of remote handlers?
Yes, why not? It's much easier to do that in Lisp than in C, where
the local handlers should be implemented.
> > In that context, it might indeed make sense to pass the file, not its
> > parent directory, because the handler can easily reconstruct the
> > parent directory if that's what it needs. By contrast, there's no way
> > for the handler to intuit the file which was stripped.
> >
> > WDYT?
>
> I still don't understand what's the difference between local and remote
> events in your eyes.
See above. Admittedly, this is a minor point, so not worth arguing if
you disagree with my POV.
> I've tried to implement remote handlers to behave exactly like the
> local ones. That's the Tramp philosophy.
Right, but in this case there are 2 flavors of local handlers, and the
question is on which of them to model the remote ones.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-03-22 15:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-16 14:14 bug#26126: 26.0.50; file-notify-rm-watch removes arbitrary watches Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 14:41 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 14:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-17 16:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-17 17:45 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 8:30 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 13:32 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:37 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 9:39 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 11:14 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-19 19:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-20 20:39 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 8:44 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-21 18:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 13:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 15:44 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2017-03-22 16:01 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 16:13 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 16:23 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 19:54 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 12:50 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 13:59 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:27 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 16:37 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:12 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 19:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-26 7:08 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:56 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 12:56 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-19 22:05 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 13:05 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-21 15:06 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-21 15:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-22 13:17 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 17:43 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-22 18:57 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 20:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 7:36 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-23 15:22 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-23 16:10 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-22 19:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-24 20:44 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-25 8:57 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:17 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-03-25 16:34 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 14:04 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:19 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 17:09 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 17:26 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:18 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-25 18:40 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-25 16:21 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:28 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-18 19:49 ` Michael Albinus
2017-03-18 20:48 ` Andreas Politz
2017-03-30 18:15 ` Paul Eggert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=838tnx71u0.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=26126@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=michael.albinus@gmx.de \
--cc=politza@hochschule-trier.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).