From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#28714: Shouldn't minibuffer-complete add a space after sole completions? Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 10:28:11 +0300 Message-ID: <838tgnv2lw.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a815jzw0.fsf@jidanni.org> <87y3ooymaj.fsf@jidanni.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507361356 25501 195.159.176.226 (7 Oct 2017 07:29:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 28714@debbugs.gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca To: =?UTF-8?Q?=E7=A9=8D=E4=B8=B9=E5=B0=BC?= Dan Jacobson Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 07 09:29:10 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXp-0005Nk-VE for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 09:29:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48730 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXu-0007E1-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:29:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32829) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXl-0007Du-RZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:29:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXi-00079I-Eo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:29:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:45024) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXi-00078y-Bh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXi-0005wO-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:29:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 07:29:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28714 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 28714-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28714.150736130922781 (code B ref 28714); Sat, 07 Oct 2017 07:29:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 28714) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2017 07:28:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53705 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jXA-0005vN-Pd for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:28:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41682) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jX9-0005v9-AD for 28714@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:28:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jX0-0006VP-RA for 28714@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:43807) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jX0-0006VF-N7; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1934 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1e0jX0-0007Md-2m; Sat, 07 Oct 2017 03:28:18 -0400 In-reply-to: <87y3ooymaj.fsf@jidanni.org> X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:138026 Archived-At: > From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson > > Date: Sat, 07 Oct 2017 05:54:44 +0800 > Cc: 28714@debbugs.gnu.org > > $ touch /tmp/abbbbb /tmp/abbbbbbbbbbbbbb > Find file or URL: > / [self-insert-command] > t [self-insert-command] > m [self-insert-command] > p [self-insert-command] > / [self-insert-command] > a [self-insert-command] > b [self-insert-command] > [minibuffer-complete] > [minibuffer-complete] > b b [self-insert-command] > [minibuffer-complete] > [minibuffer-complete] > > Now try the same thing in bash outside of emacs. > > The user at every moment is aware how many completions there are, and it > only takes a total of two tabs vs. four in emacs. "M-x icomplete-mode RET", then repeat your experiment. Which is better now, Emacs or Bash? And if icomplete is still not good enough, there's a plethora of fancier completion packages out there, both bundled and unbundled.