From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36616: 27.0.50; Say how many tests failed Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 21:13:08 +0300 Message-ID: <838st32kaz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ef2v2tq8.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="165766"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 12 20:14:08 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03b-000gxx-Hf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 20:14:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51710 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03a-0002zB-1i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:14:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03X-0002z3-QP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:14:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03W-0006GY-V7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:14:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60113) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03W-0006GO-QD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:14:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm03W-0000xo-JS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:14:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:14:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36616 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 36616-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36616.15629552063652 (code B ref 36616); Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:14:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36616) by debbugs.gnu.org; 12 Jul 2019 18:13:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40701 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02w-0000wp-I3 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:38675) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02u-0000wc-6c for 36616@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02p-0005n7-2M; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1820 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1hm02m-0006DM-6B; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 14:13:18 -0400 In-reply-to: (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:04 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:162795 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 36616@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 16:58:04 +0200 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > I'm not sure, because there can be expected failures as well. > > Maybe "0 unexpected results"? > > Hm... But aren't expected failures successes? :-) No, they are failures. But expected.