From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36729: 27.0.50; Unclear total in directory listing Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 10:50:45 +0300 Message-ID: <838scia2zu.fsf@gnu.org> References: <048FD91B-CDA0-4444-8F6F-C5B2F5C595CD@acm.org> <83k1ceusn1.fsf@gnu.org> <87sgr2887n.fsf@gmx.net> <871rjyn5hn.fsf@gnus.org> <87mu2hen02.fsf@gmx.net> <87r1qa4pct.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="11959"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mattiase@acm.org, 36729@debbugs.gnu.org, stephen.berman@gmx.net To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 07 09:51:18 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4EH-0002yq-RV for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 09:51:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37742 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4EG-0005fn-Qb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4E3-0005eK-W0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:43482) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4E2-0004fi-8R for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:51:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4E2-000570-5H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:51:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36729 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36729-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36729.160205704819628 (code B ref 36729); Wed, 07 Oct 2020 07:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36729) by debbugs.gnu.org; 7 Oct 2020 07:50:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55028 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4Dn-00056W-Tl for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:50:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:59124) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4Dm-00056F-GP for 36729@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:50:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41196) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4Dg-0004df-VW; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:50:40 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1165 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ4Df-000810-Rt; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:50:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87r1qa4pct.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:44:18 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189993 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Mattias Engdegård , Eli Zaretskii > , > 36729@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2020 06:44:18 +0200 > > Stephen Berman writes: > > > Yes, but since this idea won't work with all ls implementations, I > > assumed it's not worth pursuing. > > It works with ls on GNU systems, right? I think that's what we care > about most. I no longer understand what we are trying to solve here. Can someone please summarize the current HEAD of this discussion? E.g., what would replace that summary line under the latest proposals?