From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#44794: 28.0.50; Frame creation broken with (tool-bar-mode -1) Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 17:49:54 +0200 Message-ID: <838satxufx.fsf@gnu.org> References: Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14983"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: dfussner@googlemail.com, 44794@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Kangas Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 22 16:51:12 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrdt-0003g4-J4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 16:51:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48290 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrds-0000ou-Bx for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:51:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:57506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrdm-0000om-F9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrdm-0008Rc-7q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:51:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrdm-0005sB-5V for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:51:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:51:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 44794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 44794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B44794.160606021222505 (code B ref 44794); Sun, 22 Nov 2020 15:51:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 44794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Nov 2020 15:50:12 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48091 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrcy-0005qv-Bm for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:50:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39188) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrcv-0005qd-Ah for 44794@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:46001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrcp-000817-ML; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2095 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kgrco-0005JT-20; Sun, 22 Nov 2020 10:50:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Kangas on Sun, 22 Nov 2020 07:20:09 -0800) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:193848 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Kangas > Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 07:20:09 -0800 > > > I bisected it to commit 36431e1679, which modifies xterm.c. Reverting > > that commit and rebuilding brings back the previous behavior, and all > > looks correct to me. > > Thank you for bisecting and the clear recipe. This points at a recent > and fairly trivial patch by me, but I unfortunately can't reproduce the > issue here. > > There is something subtle going on here that I don't understand. Does > anyone else have an idea? I suspect the WM might have something to do with this.