From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#45605: [macos] could not load dump file - more info Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 19:07:12 +0200 Message-ID: <838s9be08v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <8335zjg3yl.fsf@gnu.org> <83k0sve6ki.fsf@gnu.org> <83czyne1g8.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh1r6zvj.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15689"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pankaj@codeisgreat.org, 45605@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 02 18:09:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkPf-0003qC-TF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 18:09:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54734 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkPe-0002jM-Sj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:09:58 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNm-0001na-Ls for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:08:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49060) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNm-0000Y1-F7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:08:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNm-0004J2-9C for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:08:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 45605 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 45605-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B45605.160960725816516 (code B ref 45605); Sat, 02 Jan 2021 17:08:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 45605) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Jan 2021 17:07:38 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60604 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNN-0004IK-UZ for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:07:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:41018) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNM-0004I8-D7 for 45605@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:07:36 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56679) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNH-0000Uf-35; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:07:31 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:4804 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kvkNC-0001ie-Cq; Sat, 02 Jan 2021 12:07:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87zh1r6zvj.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sat, 02 Jan 2021 17:57:04 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:197203 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: Pankaj Jangid , 45605@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 02 Jan 2021 17:57:04 +0100 > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > > At this point all I can suggest is to make a fresh clone, run the > > build there, collect the log of the entire build in a file, and post > > here that file. > > I think I mentioned that I also got this exact same build failure on > Macos, but that it went away with a "make bootstrap"? Pankaj hasn't > said whether he's tried a bootstrap, though. (I think.) He did (I think).