From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46502: 28.0.50; [feature/native-comp] (d3a399dd) native-comp bootstrap failure Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 19:18:30 +0200 Message-ID: <838s7izmhl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87o8gn8ciy.fsf@md5i.com> <83h7m95tt2.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft1s2mp1.fsf@gnu.org> <83a6rz15jm.fsf@gnu.org> <831rdb0yt9.fsf@gnu.org> <83zgzzyn72.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2fizza9.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="16617"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: mwd@md5i.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 20 18:19:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuS-0004CN-OB for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 18:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37886 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuR-00033U-Ap for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58740) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuL-00033K-1P for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:19:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:41204) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuI-00062i-Kl for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuI-00072j-G7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46502 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46502-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46502.161384153527060 (code B ref 46502); Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46502) by debbugs.gnu.org; 20 Feb 2021 17:18:55 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52750 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVuA-00072L-GF for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:18:55 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:40854) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVu8-000726-Gf for 46502@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:18:54 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47709) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVu2-00062F-Q2; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:18:46 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1919 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lDVu2-0004U1-84; Sat, 20 Feb 2021 12:18:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:00:44 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200450 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2021 17:00:44 +0000 > Cc: Stefan Monnier , mwd@md5i.com, 46502@debbugs.gnu.org, > akrl@sdf.org > > > So the conclusion is that the differences have nothing to do with > > interrupting the build, they are caused by some of the COMPILE_FIRST > > files being not yet compiled? > > Er, I'm not sure what you're saying. They have everything to do with > interrupting the build, of course, it's what causes them. ??? The build was interrupted after macroexp.el as compiled, so how can the interrupt affect the next build?