From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46702: Link symbol name in Help Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:55:48 +0200 Message-ID: <838s7gw0zf.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874ki4kuy8.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22875"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: laszlomail@protonmail.com, 46702@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 22 17:01:14 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDe5-0005pL-SO for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:01:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41184 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDe0-0002vY-Td for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 11:01:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47174) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDa2-0006D5-Gh for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDa2-0004Dd-7o for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDa2-00012M-6Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46702 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46702-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46702.16140093683909 (code B ref 46702); Mon, 22 Feb 2021 15:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46702) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Feb 2021 15:56:08 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57272 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDZA-00010z-3F for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:56:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57182) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDZ9-00010i-66 for 46702@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:56:07 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:56969) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDZ3-0003mu-Sl; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:56:01 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3072 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lEDYz-0008TW-4c; Mon, 22 Feb 2021 10:55:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <874ki4kuy8.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:01:35 +0100) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:200593 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:01:35 +0100 > Cc: 46702@debbugs.gnu.org > > (defun help-make-xrefs (&optional buffer) > [...] > (goto-char (point-min)) > ;; Skip the header-type info, though it might be useful to parse > ;; it at some stage (e.g. "function in `library'"). > (forward-paragraph) > > Anybody know what the rationale behind this is? I in complex values, > there may be false positives, but... I tried just removing that bit and > looking at a couple of variables, and it fixes the problem described > here, and I didn't see any regressions. I think we should instead insert a newline before "Its value is...". There's absolutely no need for it to follow the initial text. This fixes the problem without doing anything with the proverbial first paragraph.