From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#36649: 27.0.50; pure space and pdumper Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 09:20:25 +0200 Message-ID: <838s72ysli.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a6yo5fgy.fsf@gnus.org> <83d03kaz6f.fsf@gnu.org> <87h7svc87d.fsf@igel.home> <87sg5bt1bp.fsf@gmail.com> <4c1248b8-88cc-ca06-6bc8-9f0bb9a98c98@cs.ucla.edu> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22198"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, rpluim@gmail.com, schwab@linux-m68k.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, 36649@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, akrl@sdf.org To: Pip Cet Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 05 08:21:16 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lw-0005gJ-SW for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 08:21:16 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58628 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lv-0001Nr-Kn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:21:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35856) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lj-0001My-0b for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:21:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49329) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4li-0004xq-5Y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:21:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4li-0006C6-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:21:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:21:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 36649 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 36649-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B36649.161492885223773 (code B ref 36649); Fri, 05 Mar 2021 07:21:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 36649) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Mar 2021 07:20:52 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60875 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lY-0006BM-GC for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:20:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:46170) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lW-0006B8-PO for 36649@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:20:51 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52990) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lO-0004n4-3y; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:20:42 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3835 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lI4lN-000892-3f; Fri, 05 Mar 2021 02:20:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from Pip Cet on Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:00:03 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:201499 Archived-At: > From: Pip Cet > Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 03:00:03 +0000 > Cc: Robert Pluim , Andreas Schwab , > Stefan Kangas , 36649@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, > Andrea Corallo > > > The convention is to put a "verify (NIL_IS_ZERO);" near the rare bits of > > code that assume Qnil is all-bits-zero. > > That would be nice, but I'm quite certain there are places in the code > that rely on this identity without doing that... There shouldn't be. If you find them, please report them.