From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#46926: Remove the quotes from highlighted/linked symbols when displaying docs Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 19:08:10 +0200 Message-ID: <838s6rhthh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83czw3jy72.fsf@gnu.org> <835z1vjvm4.fsf@gnu.org> <83ft0zhuyi.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23070"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 46926@debbugs.gnu.org, larsi@gnus.org, stefan@marxist.se, rms@gnu.org To: scame Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 13 18:09:46 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7lp-0005v1-Rf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:09:45 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52064 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7lo-0002HO-Qn for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:09:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53594) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7l9-0001M7-2A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:09:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49057) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7l8-0008Q1-OX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:09:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7l8-0002cl-IG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:09:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:09:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 46926 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 46926-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B46926.161565530710046 (code B ref 46926); Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:09:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 46926) by debbugs.gnu.org; 13 Mar 2021 17:08:27 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60603 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7kZ-0002bx-AX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:08:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35540) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7kX-0002bl-SS for 46926@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:08:26 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37406) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7kR-00085v-Qz; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:08:20 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:1716 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1lL7kD-0007lm-2F; Sat, 13 Mar 2021 12:08:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: (message from scame on Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:05:27 +0000) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:202276 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2021 17:05:27 +0000 > From: scame > Cc: "rms@gnu.org" , "46926@debbugs.gnu.org" <46926@debbugs.gnu.org>, "larsi@gnus.org" , "stefan@marxist.se" > > Until the project has such an expert consultant, wouldn't asking the > emacs community be a better way to decide such issues? E.g. running > a vote on /r/emacs. No, because offering an opt-in behavior is a better way of letting users to try the feature.