From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#49997: 27.2; idle-time reset when switching desktop-page Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 12:33:21 +0300 Message-ID: <838s0tygbi.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87eeb0mkxa.fsf@a16n.net> <83tujwdwe0.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfzakczt.fsf@gnus.org> <83eeauaihs.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6likc5a.fsf@gnus.org> <0e03c073-2678-5f47-1a92-6a585c8dfe19@gmx.at> <87czqbi03a.fsf@a16n.net> <83czqb56i2.fsf@gnu.org> <09998a72-76dc-42a6-dc15-612cbc942863@gmx.at> <83eeao1jmt.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="17473"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: pm@a16n.net, larsi@gnus.org, 49997@debbugs.gnu.org To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 22 11:34:12 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjro-0004Jc-45 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 11:34:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39880 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjrm-0000jv-Hw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:34:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjre-0000jk-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54868) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjre-0005iD-Co for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:34:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjre-0001hK-Ai for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:34:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 09:34:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 49997 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: confirmed Original-Received: via spool by 49997-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B49997.16296248196493 (code B ref 49997); Sun, 22 Aug 2021 09:34:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 49997) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Aug 2021 09:33:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38181 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjrH-0001gf-AY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:33:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55166) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjrF-0001gS-OW for 49997@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:33:38 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:43626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjr9-0005K7-Jo; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:33:31 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.95.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.95]:3940 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mHjr8-0001mQ-JK; Sun, 22 Aug 2021 05:33:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from martin rudalics on Sun, 22 Aug 2021 10:24:15 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:212406 Archived-At: > Cc: pm@a16n.net, larsi@gnus.org, 49997@debbugs.gnu.org > From: martin rudalics > Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2021 10:24:15 +0200 > > > If we end up with a list of ignored events, as I think we should, we > > should consider making the same list control all of the relevant > > features. > > Not sure whether the attached is what you meant - it's just a first stab > in that direction. Something like that, yes.