From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#52676: 28.0.50; [PATCH] Rationalize window-text-pixel-size Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 20:06:40 +0200 Message-ID: <838rwdzvbj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wnk0xaz4.fsf@dick> <87h7b43qjb.fsf@yahoo.com> <87o85byhqg.fsf@dick> <83pmpr19ri.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8ziyc0n.fsf@yahoo.com> <8335mm1voq.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtkuy6d9.fsf@yahoo.com> <83zgouyx5h.fsf@gnu.org> <87czlqw3ob.fsf@yahoo.com> <87pmppg7up.fsf@dick> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="6294"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 52676@debbugs.gnu.org To: dick Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 21 19:07:29 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXt-0001O7-8U for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 19:07:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53774 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXr-0004HI-V0 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:07:27 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44832) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXS-0004Dm-RI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44029) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXS-0000wE-IZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:07:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXS-0000Ry-E2 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:07:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 52676 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 52676-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B52676.16401100081708 (code B ref 52676); Tue, 21 Dec 2021 18:07:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 52676) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Dec 2021 18:06:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55575 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXE-0000RT-A5 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:06:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44010) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjXA-0000R8-FH for 52676@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:06:46 -0500 Original-Received: from [2001:470:142:3::e] (port=60092 helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjX5-0000oh-7w; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:06:39 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=ZmlPA3LxU+jMKnn/vn3eFKV80tgSClqVcd619VbLOeA=; b=Ns+XNbG5qOol j+A1DcdGbGu/GzSd1fVtV7cDshNSKi6wQYAA17GxewjoDRrjW4TSYa2tieyxplC4sMBC7LiE3DcIp Yn2cNe61bFU5UYdJV/6WqWeZSry+uYC+gzmHOpgfxjxhTBFOiUMuxYorGJKxrd7ZliK9sbiH2deZe WYgWwHz08cYsFisCW8dQzhLIdrAkqh+gP4sCdH55xmZgHniFNs6Ow3168UUtxhwbeLZQ2V7MFNoxR 4/uATsARk5mgws71v42Ad57ev+hWH7nPSC3D0mZhcDsnMMGbgVSvRACMKcGffSEjkoeXY9ehDV0Uf a10BUZJt9TYqZ/jcdDNvFA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=3930 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mzjX5-0003HK-5n; Tue, 21 Dec 2021 13:06:39 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87pmppg7up.fsf@dick> (message from dick on Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:56:14 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:222885 Archived-At: > From: dick > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:56:14 -0500 > Cc: 52676@debbugs.gnu.org > > Your transposition of "up" and "down" in pixel-scroll-precision > contradicts the existing understanding of those two directions. Which existing understanding is that? where does it exist? And what do you presume is being scrolled "up": the text or the window? should C-v be regarded as scrolling "up" or "down"? should PageDown be bound to scroll-down-command or scroll-up-command? > Minimally you could have kept pixel-scroll-precision in a separate > module to avoid conflating the original `pixel-scroll.el`. Even better, > you might have quarantined it in ELPA. Thank you for your valuable advice regarding file and package organization in Emacs, but we have other ideas, so no, thanks. > You remind me Chong Yidong, another spaghetti coder who was inexplicably > given free reign over the code base, and proceeded to spray the master > with indecipherable crudities still being unwound today. Hogwash.