From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#57562: [PATCH] * lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el (comp-run-async-workers): Fail more gracefully Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 08:10:26 +0300 Message-ID: <838rmzn2rh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wnakmqw6.fsf@gnu.org> <83v8q4mq8k.fsf@gnu.org> <83r10smotk.fsf@gnu.org> <83czccmf57.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="26980"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 57562@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 04 07:11:16 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhud-0006ua-Ct for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 07:11:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:51684 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuc-0003GE-9T for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:11:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47260) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuS-0003G0-1f for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:11:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54570) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuQ-0002Zf-EF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:11:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuP-0006ZQ-Ve for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:11:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 04 Sep 2022 05:11:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 57562 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 57562-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B57562.166226825925247 (code B ref 57562); Sun, 04 Sep 2022 05:11:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 57562) by debbugs.gnu.org; 4 Sep 2022 05:10:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43269 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuM-0006Z9-VY for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:10:59 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39040) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuK-0006Yw-S5 for 57562@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:10:57 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:33358) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuF-0002ZR-FZ; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:10:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=1/KX7KyGHiJPf6GRappEiIGEXq9YWk9/21lYgpLlY38=; b=ExZSYmmp0fjt /x/DgiXSAnn0NekJMjkSR560E4gj6xiACrdFQmbnl7AsOE1snd0zXCP9wYIbuon6TWX9oT7j82ViR /hDH9Ta8WY0s2aL/oSHBKHHwY3YDkWwfAZFtNErRtAVedUHP2MRMB8XOBi6IpDY2X6NENuOZTx3TS WhF2kLQepLmG7YGQspp5QwR6L7MfTRkZ7uiYc9aDxkk3gdjqCoEtxofUff1UTSeYZ9/09NA4Dj5iD lOKUn4E0/Dk1tU1IbTg+VR9zPJjIsvaPvUhzL2XzgAaEG5zMGtrLliygQ521y11f3yTFv4vgWnYxl 22TRElOnbB5PLgNI04EnRQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (port=2541 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oUhuE-0003Pu-EQ; Sun, 04 Sep 2022 01:10:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Sat, 03 Sep 2022 22:02:07 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:241462 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 57562@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sat, 03 Sep 2022 22:02:07 -0400 > > > I didn't mean to say that I didn't understand how this could happen > > _technically_. What I don't get is how come people let this happen, > > and don't pay attention until Emacs complains? Isn't it crazy to have > > your home directory unwritable by your user?? > > I think in the above scenario, if you just upgraded to Emacs-28 and it's > hence the first time you run an Emacs with native compilation, you get > a home directory that's still perfectly writable, including `~/.emacs.d` > and it's only `~/.emacs.d/eln-cache` that's owned by root. Isn't the home directory created in a way that all its subdirectories inherit the access rights by default? Anyway, what you describe is a bug in the distro, and should ideally be fixed there.