From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#61667: 29.0.60; Failure to redisplay Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:24:30 +0200 Message-ID: <838rgop4lt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <04d7cb31-684c-07c0-ee7b-503514fc1a85@yandex.ru> <87a617eanz.fsf@yahoo.com> <4306cb76-a44c-3101-e43c-fd64afae4a51@yandex.ru> <871qmje2ws.fsf@yahoo.com> <83edqjtbss.fsf@gnu.org> <4e5e2a46-9b07-206a-6774-9f98f34cbd14@yandex.ru> <83y1orrolh.fsf@gnu.org> <83sfeyswdw.fsf@gnu.org> <877cwactgv.fsf@yahoo.com> <83mt55sxli.fsf@gnu.org> <8afe34f2-eeea-3be8-82ef-576a115beb6d@yandex.ru> <96b742a05da174ece02e@heytings.org> <25c48260-2edc-f062-8fef-52ff2fdd22e3@yandex.ru> <96b742a05dea855f9636@heytings.org> <853eca8f-5850-dd73-7601-4fad92613ab9@yandex.ru> <83lekopask.fsf@gnu.org> <3d652eb5-339d-7185-b89f-fba49909aab4@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="10481"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 61667@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 23 20:25:24 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHDY-0002WE-LG for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 20:25:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHDF-0003Vk-Sp; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:25:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHDC-0003VK-Ix for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHDC-0003YK-8r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:25:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHDC-0000ko-4g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:25:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:25:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 61667 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 61667-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B61667.16771802802861 (code B ref 61667); Thu, 23 Feb 2023 19:25:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 61667) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2023 19:24:40 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35384 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHCq-0000k5-0H for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:24:40 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:35736) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHCn-0000jo-Se for 61667@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:24:38 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHCi-0003Tv-6o; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:24:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=WeGHYx/47ScG8RKwxYL7QP1UwP9hu7uSleEnY5oMJLI=; b=eo9euRvIXtdN ue6JdmiOefsPnmMqOCjJNL3oGsg1vgrPzRQRVHk/wr25s4zpOPtOxpndLN79sT6xu90ZkP7zEQQ1s 5kxk81GZm5ZvOUkyntItmo+07mBp542H5Zp3xBrN+Qz4gV4hgbzsky38x8Rw6cNF1/wqgZ+3Cw+Cz SWTXZbK8Gi+ZsfJmiBK3O/oZOlJYbMCpbe0IanizFwBP+ZujdlMKZvEeixN9ekXgTO5tMN09IMDg5 Jj680naTDHZcIci4F9mD9UlKRxakM54D9qe1URn1YHAxuMQZ7wCRpXL8Ec/1aGp95ulXMbx6p7kgR IUhEqi/7Tx222+iDSj7jxA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pVHCh-0008Qz-K1; Thu, 23 Feb 2023 14:24:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3d652eb5-339d-7185-b89f-fba49909aab4@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:12:42 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:256519 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2023 21:12:42 +0200 > Cc: luangruo@yahoo.com, 61667@debbugs.gnu.org, gregory@heytings.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > > >> - Run the command above > >> - Press "a" > >> - Look for the delay between the title bar and the window updates > >> > >> With the above 'emacs -Q' it's not as prominent as with my config, but > >> it can reach what looks like 100-200ms. Once every 10 tries or so. > > Isn't that the 100-ms delay we wait for the initial frame to finish > > displaying, since that requires that we receive some messages from X? > > Probably not: in this scenario I usually wait for the frame to finish > resizing, rendering, etc, and for *scratch* to be displayed properly, > and then I press 'a'. And without double-buffering you see no such delays? not even the short ones of 100ms?