From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 15:37:48 +0300 Message-ID: <838rd8iqcj.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5xrzsph.fsf@stebalien.com> <83pm6nlhll.fsf@gnu.org> <87v8gfmqyt.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilcflbua.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt1rmjjg.fsf@gmail.com> <83v8gfjnzj.fsf@gnu.org> <87edn3mbr3.fsf@gmail.com> <83mt1rjg69.fsf@gnu.org> <875y8fm7x7.fsf@gmail.com> <83lehbjdjd.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn0vkqn1.fsf@gmail.com> <83jzwvj94x.fsf@gnu.org> <83ilcfj8dy.fsf@gnu.org> <87o7m4lper.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="18089"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun May 28 14:38:14 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Ff4-0004UL-Gk for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 14:38:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Feu-0000d6-4a; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:38:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Fes-0000cv-EM for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Fes-0006Aj-6A for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:38:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Fer-0000Ut-Nm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:38:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 12:38:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63731.16852774411855 (code B ref 63731); Sun, 28 May 2023 12:38:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 May 2023 12:37:21 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3FeC-0000Tr-SS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44912) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q3FeA-0000Td-SP for 63731@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:37:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Fe5-00065H-2N; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:37:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=bT7lwy5s3WeWfqYVCoF3Y/CEwYb8mwTzk9CCF3k9lXM=; b=kMZBr8BuXF+a4CpqsGXz C1U7dK/TMCGzE5aau5/HdhMDO50fW1WHsbbB1Xi+0IVcx6LoGc//HOtBzJGf63a8j2+Gr7FW6lLgJ 4dxNlTH1igtxSSJU+1kl0yarwYQkNauQ8Wad+/WnEwm87cmjfWIDu85tYy7De88YSg4G1Wr74AXZ2 3hWOvENt0gsR8VAIeCVRtLtxIjHP0gX4zFFSF37Jah1P3JPpydup/IUS1MdWaWIFLIyF83/lXVM2s 0Wcv/XLrONeSCcJkRU4oMbrGVU1/wm4bAvZcXQDwgngdbXV8VrwzfvkNU4eqiPxVwUoz+MnbrQj4Q 08+nF0f4EhLfoA==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q3Fe4-0000jE-IT; Sun, 28 May 2023 08:37:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87o7m4lper.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Sun, 28 May 2023 12:29:48 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:262532 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com > Date: Sun, 28 May 2023 12:29:48 +0200 > > >>>>> On Fri, 26 May 2023 20:43:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: > > Eli> Actually, I don't understand why there's an issue here with font > Eli> selection. Are you saying that using Noto Color Emoji with > Eli> CHAR+0xFE0E, when CHAR is an Emoji character, doesn't produce the > Eli> textual representation of CHAR? If so, isn't that a problem with the > Eli> font? I thought all we needed to do was to hand the combination to an > Eli> Emoji-aware font, and the font would do the rest. Now you seem to be > Eli> saying that we somehow need to select a non-Emoji font? But if so, > Eli> who'd guarantee that a font that cannot display Emoji will know what > Eli> to do with the combination CHAR+0xFE0E? > > Iʼm not sure: gedit displays the text representation, and libreoffice > displays the emoji presentation. And the google color emoji website > only shows colour glyphs. So I think itʼs up to the application to > select the correct font. But what is "the correct font", when the sequence of codepoints is CHAR+0xFE0E? How do we identify such a font? Do you know of a font that produces the correct glyph for this sequence, when HarfBuzz is used as the shaping engine?