From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#64406: [PATCH] Improve commands to manage Python imports Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2023 10:28:22 +0300 Message-ID: <838rbpbl2h.fsf@gnu.org> References: <874jmnbd5v.fsf@gmail.com> <87pm534puk.fsf@gmail.com> <87lefr399j.fsf@gmail.com> <87bkgl39bm.fsf@gmail.com> < CAFEQCfBHfL680oYFgN7jSRdkT-hCDGjtJMYhCxyO5SJ1W5iq4A@mail.gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3938"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: arstoffel@gmail.com, 64406@debbugs.gnu.org To: Matthias Meulien Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 09 09:29:18 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOr6-0000oP-NT for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 09:29:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqu-00059S-41; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:29:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqs-000595-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqr-0003lH-Vp for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:29:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqr-0000So-Ri for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:29:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 09 Jul 2023 07:29:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 64406 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 64406-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B64406.16888877041726 (code B ref 64406); Sun, 09 Jul 2023 07:29:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 64406) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Jul 2023 07:28:24 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45692 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqF-0000Rm-RU for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:28:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54636) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOqD-0000RY-A2 for 64406@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:28:22 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOq8-0003a4-34; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:28:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=b3G1RM+hNApPMUbQc5HzuzXp37QswYtzDc//pjKKfPI=; b=hWVf78BurA+L Bj0SokPDYJ/IUNbwNAZJ4GVE34mCb16jUzg9ETRopgbid1lvLnqvwn/WA0gB+2AZ2S56BLS5epezD FM3Fh0bemMKrTyYSfg4GbAHPbb2coZtxtJEmPMVFLssxgDuw+ne/r/kND5GcSE3T+EDGffA5HUDk6 e1ukbWe7cqCMWYTuwyL+bwcNj6PrFAyqClFYsMfhbk6BVWtaE/GpPnsY4E8hUM2+OlJhNfG1EO5zc n42fT8c7a9rTSarsxp70qDxSkbfMFrgEP7S8//DS4SNYuRbN/gNzRe5zOqg0spkMFdJ/K9nCScvQC Zjfu2067wpT1DKxgVELAZw==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qIOq7-0000dR-J7; Sun, 09 Jul 2023 03:28:15 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Matthias Meulien on Sun, 9 Jul 2023 08:32:09 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:264821 Archived-At: > From: Matthias Meulien > Date: Sun, 9 Jul 2023 08:32:09 +0200 > Cc: 64406@debbugs.gnu.org, Augusto Stoffel > > Sorry Eli for asking such trivial question but I didn't manage to find hints on the web: Now that this bug > is tagged as done, should I create a new bug for last two patches or is it possible to reopen? No need to submit a new bug, if the discussion is still about the same issue. Reopening is appropriate if the original bug is deemed not fixed; otherwise, just keep CC'ing the bug number, even so it is closed. IOW, "closed" doesn't mean the discussion cannot go on, and also doesn't mean we cannot augment the solution by additional fixes for whatever leftovers we find. Did you read admin/notes/bugtracker? It might have cleared up some of this. It also explains how to reopen a bug if you need that.