From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#67604: Motion problems with inline images Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 21:44:02 +0200 Message-ID: <838r60v81p.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83cyvn6wix.fsf@gnu.org> <190CBBD6-067F-41D8-B5EE-6E1643F01C02@gmail.com> <83ttoy5cqo.fsf@gnu.org> <4FF4BC61-297C-41CD-8094-5BFB7CF2594B@gmail.com> <83r0k259wv.fsf@gnu.org> <83plzm590d.fsf@gnu.org> <9F116A2F-AC1C-4E7D-8870-60561BFD537C@gmail.com> <83lea96d8n.fsf@gnu.org> <778F3EE6-3AC6-4D0E-86B0-CD22751F38B5@gmail.com> <83jzpt69my.fsf@gnu.org> <83h6kx5o2u.fsf@gnu.org> <8698018C-6994-4CD2-8810-F77A65D60212@gmail.com> <83ttow3t2h.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37430"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 67604@debbugs.gnu.org To: JD Smith Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 11 20:45:34 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmDd-0009Wv-Mj for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 20:45:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmDG-0006on-Iw; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:45:12 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmD2-0006gi-So for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmCs-0002sR-NB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:44:54 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmD7-0000HR-Jv for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:45:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:45:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 67604 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 67604-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B67604.17023238751027 (code B ref 67604); Mon, 11 Dec 2023 19:45:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 67604) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Dec 2023 19:44:35 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54696 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmCh-0000GU-20 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:44:35 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:53922) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmCd-0000GH-TJ for 67604@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:44:32 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCmCJ-0002q0-HO; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:44:11 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=MIME-version:References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From: Date; bh=wwRwowYT3N2fkcj6v8fW+AWUTeq17NfFc2Pvziee81Q=; b=LuEXrXmd59f31uNNX+Ed nXURhVzzf87DfuXjfRGxiVfa1KtOEeFT2Hr3s9OCXVl/MmYegKjmouayi4JZtkYxVZpn1cW/Ve7te oDrGo6BhWCnLLstBnPe5Hyy4rLgbOUw53q4ZyqUY2Cnj423jSHeOPrgJkqbkJnrJ+1TltSCjjf4Tw hOmSnSgmD+AwU1euFvO00Mm0RgQQcvC51lnqvQGpX7yQbKrOnj3g4mpD7bv9nXWQlqHqIyQUcFFGJ GMNmicsyqqKDt3rvceQJuhJFCARqsSCbb3XJ94vn85nsgg2KvQfqXxy9RinqCNsE72WufKnfy1YhL 3XTr/0lowqam2g==; In-Reply-To: (message from JD Smith on Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:06:38 -0500) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:276003 Archived-At: > From: JD Smith > Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 14:06:38 -0500 > Cc: 67604@debbugs.gnu.org > > > > > On Dec 5, 2023, at 10:31 PM, Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> OK, so this was likely a false positive then. I’m out of ideas. Maybe Windows is magically immune. > > > > Unlikely. More likely is that we need some specific metrics of the > > displayed stuff to see the problem (which is therefore very rare). > > I agree with this sentiment: it does seem to require special tuning to reveal itself. I wanted to check to see if you had received my news that I reproduced the line-skip motion bug on a GNU/Linux system. That would seem to confirm it’s a general issue with the display/motion code dealing with inline images. Let me know if I can produce anything else to help with this one. Thanks. I've eventually succeeded in reproducing it. I will get to it when I have time; however, with the current tempest on emacs-devel and other urgent issues, I don't know when will that be.