From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#17588: 24.3.91; mouse-face glitchy Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 05:38:01 +0300 Message-ID: <837g59jmd2.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lhtpwuh5@ristopher.com> <83a9a5k6dw.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppj1sjz9@ristopher.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1401071967 2136 80.91.229.3 (26 May 2014 02:39:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 02:39:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 17588@debbugs.gnu.org To: Christopher Schmidt Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 26 04:39:20 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Wokop-0001bG-2S for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 04:39:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wokoo-0004jh-I7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:39:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40231) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Wokog-0004jX-Vo for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:39:16 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WokoZ-00077T-AY for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:39:10 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:32979) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WokoZ-00077O-7X for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WokoY-0004pt-Jx for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:39:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 02:39:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 17588 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: X-Debbugs-Original-Cc: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Original-Received: via spool by submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B.140107191318533 (code B ref -1); Mon, 26 May 2014 02:39:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at submit) by debbugs.gnu.org; 26 May 2014 02:38:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60089 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Woko4-0004oq-Rt for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38429) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1Woko2-0004oc-JS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Woknr-00072L-Ud for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::11]:60495) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Woknr-00072G-JP for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40139) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Woknm-0004hQ-6n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Woknh-0006xg-0j for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:14 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:49517) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WoknX-0006vM-Ou for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 25 May 2014 22:38:08 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0N6500J00TR6OX00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 05:37:58 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0N6500JF2TZ9H060@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Mon, 26 May 2014 05:37:58 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <87ppj1sjz9@ristopher.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Solaris 10 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:89492 Archived-At: > From: Christopher Schmidt > Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 16:04:43 -0400 (EDT) > > Eli Zaretskii writes: > > In general, each redisplay requires removing the mouse-highlight and > > then re-applying it, so if Emacs cannot keep up, you might see > > annoyingly visible flickering or even such extreme effects as you > > describe. There's nothing new here. > > There is no flickering. The artefacts are permanent. > > It can work just fine. Something triggers the issue. After triggering, > scrolling or resizing windows of the affected frame usually make the > artefacts disappear again and highlighting works just fine. > > The window configuration of my recipe is important, too. Using just one > rms2 window makes it impossible to reproduce this issue here. > > > From: Christopher Schmidt > > Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 15:04:18 -0400 (EDT) > [...] > >> My real use-case, which provokes this issue after a few minutes, is a > >> process filter which updates the buffer of a window exactly once a > >> second. > [...] > > May I ask what is the real-life situation where you need to refresh > > the display at such high frequency? > > I do not think updating a window once a second is unreasonable. I have > never seen this issue with 24.3. Well, I don't see any issues now, either. Perhaps some other factor is at work here. How was your Emacs built? (The information collected by 'report-emacs-bug' was not present in your report.) Also, can you try running this on some other machine, perhaps a faster one?