From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#23632: 25.1.50; Gratuitous undo boundary in latex-insert-block Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:22:35 +0300 Message-ID: <837fe2thh0.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87lh2vo7s6.fsf@gmail.com> <87shx23830.fsf@gmail.com> <87wpmcwn13.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87wpm9q4z7.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87vb1rbbg1.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87shwutfmo.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87porxrk4v.fsf@russet.org.uk> <8b9b4630b1282ed76fe26452b4a8fbb6.squirrel@cloud103.planethippo.com> <87r3cacrpz.fsf@russet.org.uk> <838tyitk2k.fsf@gnu.org> <878tyicooh.fsf@russet.org.uk> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1465230789 12631 80.91.229.3 (6 Jun 2016 16:33:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, 23632@debbugs.gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 06 18:32:58 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xST-0001gf-BX for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 18:32:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43653 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xSS-00017N-CM for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:32:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42648) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xIx-0001Ej-Ik for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:23:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xIs-0007jJ-8q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:23:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44607) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xIs-0007jD-5W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:23:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xIs-0001v3-1H for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:23:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:23:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 23632 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 23632-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B23632.14652301397313 (code B ref 23632); Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:23:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 23632) by debbugs.gnu.org; 6 Jun 2016 16:22:19 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56944 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xIA-0001tt-Pg for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51323) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xI7-0001td-G6 for 23632@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:22:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xI1-0007Wt-FE for 23632@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:22:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:54690) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xHw-0007WF-Ji; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:22:04 -0400 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:4092 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1b9xHu-0001jm-C2; Mon, 06 Jun 2016 12:22:02 -0400 In-reply-to: <878tyicooh.fsf@russet.org.uk> (phillip.lord@russet.org.uk) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:119159 Archived-At: > From: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) > Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, cyd@gnu.org, 23632@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 16:38:54 +0100 > > > Can you summarize its effect? It doesn't disable undo in recursive > > editing, does it? > > No. It limits the addition of undo-boundaries to those buffers that have > changed in at the same level of recursion. So, for example, undo will > function in mini-buffer during completing-read, but changes in the > mini-buffer will not result in the addition of undo-boundaries to > buffers that changed during the command that lead to the > completing-read. I guess I'm still confused a bit, because now I'm not sure what difference does the change make. Does it record each change only once, where previously we could record it several times? If not, what does the above-mentioned limitation achieve, in terms of user-visible effects?