From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#24520: 25.1.50; calccard.tex has somewhat unclear licensing Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:41:06 +0200 Message-ID: <837f86hxwt.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87wpi2l9yp.fsf@Sam-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <83h98keben.fsf@gnu.org> <83vawt1zay.fsf@gnu.org> <81k2d7bvhh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83h983nr67.fsf@gnu.org> <83lgx7qxjb.fsf@gnu.org> <834m3urfbo.fsf@gnu.org> <83h97pn8hh.fsf@gnu.org> <8337j8mo2g.fsf@gnu.org> <83mvh5ceym.fsf@gnu.org> <838tsncprj.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1479139718 29778 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2016 16:08:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 16:08:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: naesten@gmail.com, 24520@debbugs.gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 14 17:08:31 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JnH-0000jd-M9 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 17:07:39 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41063 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JnK-0008JK-Fp for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:07:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34917) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JOX-0003Fd-0J for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JOT-0007dU-Uu for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:42:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:41867) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JOT-0007dM-R4 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JOT-0004iL-Iy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:42:01 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:42:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 24520 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 24520-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B24520.147913806618037 (code B ref 24520); Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:42:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 24520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2016 15:41:06 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57265 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JNa-0004gr-K7 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:43514) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JNZ-0004gH-Al for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JNS-0007Q4-TZ for 24520@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:40:59 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:38504) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JNP-0007Pc-AM; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:40:55 -0500 Original-Received: from 84.94.185.246.cable.012.net.il ([84.94.185.246]:1887 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1c6JNO-0004ie-CU; Mon, 14 Nov 2016 10:40:54 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Glenn Morris on Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:56:37 -0500) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:125688 Archived-At: > From: Glenn Morris > Cc: eliz@gnu.org, naesten@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 18:56:37 -0500 > > > 1) Following from the removal of "This file is part of GNU Emacs.", > I suggest s/GNU Emacs/This document/ (or "This reference card") in the > rest of the permission notice. I don't understand why should we treat these files differently from any other file in the tree. They all speak about "GNU Emacs". > a) mention the filename "calccard.tex" so people receiving it > out-of-context can find the source easily The name of the file is already mentioned. > b) the commented-out FSF address seems kind of useless nowadays... Again, how is this different from other files?