From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#29598: 26.0; doc of `load-history' Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 12:48:30 +0200 Message-ID: <837etwuqgx.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1512816546 7907 195.159.176.226 (9 Dec 2017 10:49:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2017 10:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 29598@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 09 11:49:02 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgo-0001ub-DD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 11:49:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40791 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgv-0007HM-M4 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:49:09 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgp-0007Gr-R0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:49:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgo-0004H1-Oy for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:49:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:44471) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgo-0004Gr-LE for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgo-0002Uw-E0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:49:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:49:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 29598 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 29598-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B29598.15128165399593 (code B ref 29598); Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:49:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 29598) by debbugs.gnu.org; 9 Dec 2017 10:48:59 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53152 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgl-0002Uf-LX for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:48:59 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50453) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgk-0002UU-KT for 29598@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:48:58 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcga-0003yh-Gc for 29598@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:48:53 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:59404) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcga-0003yX-Cl; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:48:48 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=4303 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1eNcgZ-0006hs-UA; Sat, 09 Dec 2017 05:48:48 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:55:22 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:140852 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2017 21:55:22 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > Shouldn't the doc say something about the order of the elements of the > alist? It's a history, but neither the Elisp manual nor the doc string > mentions whether the beginning or the end of the list is the oldest part > of the history of loads. Since it's an alist, and every element should be there only once, why does the order matter?