From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#31888: 27.0.50; Segmentation fault in replace-buffer-contents Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:39:20 +0300 Message-ID: <837emho5kn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <39638875-4e85-85dc-1cfa-3bfb7321e6b0@zoho.com> <83602bq8hl.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmc1vjn8.fsf@gnu.org> <877emnm97t.fsf@gmail.com> <83muvisyqv.fsf@gnu.org> <83efgpofdu.fsf@gnu.org> <83bmbtobvn.fsf@gnu.org> <838t6xo5sh.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1530293905 28996 195.159.176.226 (29 Jun 2018 17:38:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:38:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: acm@muc.de, 31888@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, k.michal@zoho.com To: monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 29 19:38:20 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxLg-0007SJ-CS for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 19:38:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxNn-00022J-Js for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46544) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxNO-0001pY-7U for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxNL-0002bI-3v for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:60397) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxNL-0002aT-0W for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxNJ-0007e5-Sa for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 31888 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 31888-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B31888.153029397229348 (code B ref 31888); Fri, 29 Jun 2018 17:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 31888) by debbugs.gnu.org; 29 Jun 2018 17:39:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:40060 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxMq-0007dH-2b for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:39:32 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55393) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxMo-0007d5-8q for 31888@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:39:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxMi-0001Ng-Dh for 31888@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:39:25 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:45917) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxMV-000128-Lb; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:39:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1650 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1fYxMU-0004ya-W3; Fri, 29 Jun 2018 13:39:11 -0400 In-reply-to: <838t6xo5sh.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Fri, 29 Jun 2018 20:34:38 +0300) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:147972 Archived-At: > From: Eli Zaretskii > Cc: acm@muc.de, 31888@debbugs.gnu.org, joaotavora@gmail.com, k.michal@zoho.com > > Is that worth the hassle? The caller asked to replace the entire > buffer by something else, why should they expect after-change hooks to > be run on something other than the entire buffer? s/entire buffer/entire accessible portion of buffer/g