From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39706: 28.0.50; Search prefix nroff-mode Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 17:18:02 +0200 Message-ID: <837e0dib85.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87h7zkes1o.fsf@mail.linkov.net> <83sgj4js7w.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9nykufh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="67856"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 39706@debbugs.gnu.org To: Juri Linkov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Feb 23 16:19:13 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t2G-000HYA-LU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 16:19:12 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53848 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t2F-0001Lc-Nt for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:19:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54299) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t27-0001LF-Jw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:19:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t26-0008Mr-LS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:19:03 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45492) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t26-0008Mn-IZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:19:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t26-0006OG-Ek for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:19:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:19:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39706 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 39706-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39706.158247109524504 (code B ref 39706); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 15:19:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39706) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Feb 2020 15:18:15 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51465 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t1L-0006NA-5Q for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:18:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39112) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t1J-0006Mx-5j for 39706@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:18:13 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:37571) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t1D-0007wq-MC; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2975 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1j5t1D-0007lW-1S; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 10:18:07 -0500 In-reply-to: <87v9nykufh.fsf@mail.linkov.net> (message from Juri Linkov on Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:40:18 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:176421 Archived-At: > From: Juri Linkov > Cc: 39706@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 02:40:18 +0200 > > The point of my bug report is that I accidentally discovered > a problem in nroff-mode that otherwise I don't use. > > > IOW, what you propose sounds like a very convoluted and indirect way > > of fixing the problem you described, doesn't it? > > The proposed patch fixes nroff-mode to make the search prefix available > for users of nroff-mode. Sounds like I've misunderstood your report. Apologies. Could you perhaps describe the root cause again, this time focusing on the actual problem? Your original description made me think the program was with log files, and nroff-mode just got in the way, but you seem to be talking about a genuine problem in nroff-mode. What is that problem?