From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#42386: Acknowledgement ([PATCH] Handle symbols in project-kill-buffers-ignores) Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 13:49:51 +0300 Message-ID: <837dv2ju0g.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87y2nitv2c.fsf@warpmail.net> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="9772"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 42386@debbugs.gnu.org To: "Philip K." Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 17 12:51:14 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNxR-0002Rr-Vv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 12:51:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35282 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNxQ-0004AY-WA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:51:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNxG-00048h-4g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:51:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45232) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNxF-0003iv-S1 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:51:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNxF-00015l-R6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:51:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:51:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 42386 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 42386-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B42386.15949830144139 (code B ref 42386); Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:51:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 42386) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jul 2020 10:50:14 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56778 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNwU-00014h-4I for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:50:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:57780) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNwR-00014T-F2 for 42386@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:50:12 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45763) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNwM-0003R1-3H; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:50:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2115 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jwNwJ-0000lK-VJ; Fri, 17 Jul 2020 06:50:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y2nitv2c.fsf@warpmail.net> (philip@warpmail.net) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:183138 Archived-At: > From: "Philip K." > Cc: 42386@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:16:59 +0200 > > I don't see any way around this, except for trying to analyse the > symbols string representation or checking the arity if the > function. Neither seem like a particularly clean approach. Dmitry suggested a cons cell, which will allow you to differentiate between predicates and major-modes. Isn't that a way around the problem?