From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#43519: 28.0.50; Overlay at end of minibuf hides minibuf's real content Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 22:47:40 +0300 Message-ID: <837dsmykrn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wo0p1twr.fsf@gnu.org> <83r1qx1q9v.fsf@gnu.org> <838sd425l2.fsf@gnu.org> <83y2l3xm15.fsf@gnu.org> <83eemvxbvg.fsf@gnu.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="7876"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 43519@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Sep 21 21:56:24 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRvE-0001tF-4M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:56:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44678 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRvD-00015n-5E for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:56:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52854) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRn7-0004dk-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:48:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:44858) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRn7-0000aY-Iw for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:48:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRn7-0004kB-I8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:48:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:48:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 43519 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 43519-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B43519.160071766518197 (code B ref 43519); Mon, 21 Sep 2020 19:48:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 43519) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 Sep 2020 19:47:45 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:56401 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRmr-0004jQ-82 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:47:45 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45956) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRmp-0004fY-LP for 43519@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:47:43 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:35642) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRmj-0000ZQ-Sz; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:47:37 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3927 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kKRmj-0007WR-CQ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:47:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Stefan Monnier on Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:17:11 -0400) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:188647 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 43519@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:17:11 -0400 > > >> I've been trying out the patch below and haven't bumped into any > >> surprising behavior yet, but admittedly, I probably lack creativity. > > IOW, you leave it entirely to the generic window-display code to > > select window-start based just on the value of point? > > Yes. It seems to work very well. > Even the corner case regression above doesn't seem very serious and can > be addressed using the scroll_conservatively code. I'd rather we didn't change the behavior all over because of this one use case. But if no one is interested in my proposal, you can do whatever you wish.