From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#41520: 28.0.50; Crash in character.h due to assertion error Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 19:00:44 +0300 Message-ID: <837dsfnr9v.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83imgkw11q.fsf@gnu.org> <837dx0vysk.fsf@gnu.org> <87wo0f1e3e.fsf@gnus.org> <83blhrntcm.fsf@gnu.org> <878scv1b18.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="15599"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 41520@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, pipcet@gmail.com To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 27 18:07:29 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZCy-0003x0-WD for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 18:07:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47752 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZCy-0000KZ-1x for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:07:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59330) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ7i-0004I5-H8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:02:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:38714) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ7i-00084X-6u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:02:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ7i-0005cS-4I for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:02:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:02:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 41520 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 41520-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B41520.160122247121532 (code B ref 41520); Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:02:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 41520) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Sep 2020 16:01:11 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50259 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ6t-0005bE-0i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:01:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:52318) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ6q-0005b0-Rp for 41520@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:01:10 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:53048) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ6i-0007w0-Fx; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:01:00 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1369 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kMZ6h-000668-F3; Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:01:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <878scv1b18.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:42:27 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189144 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Cc: 41520@debbugs.gnu.org, stefan@marxist.se, pipcet@gmail.com > Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:42:27 +0200 > > There was then some followup discussion about renaming some of these > macros, since they have names that sometimes lead to some confusion, but > I think it's perhaps too much churn for too little gain. Yes. In general, I'd prefer not to rename veteran macros unnecessarily, as they are more or less burned into the muscle memory of those who frequently work on the Emacs internals. Into my memory, definitely. These two macros are from that group. > So I think everything is fixed here now? Yes.