From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34589: 26.1.91; GDB-MI Display Complex Data Types Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 21:30:40 +0300 Message-ID: <837dsbi0bz.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83wolugz2r.fsf@gnu.org> <83va1aq1ui.fsf@gnu.org> <83o972pz92.fsf@gnu.org> <83zhqbe2og.fsf@gnu.org> <83va0tag67.fsf@gnu.org> <87v9fvyw6f.fsf@gnus.org> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29555"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: gustaf.waldemarson@gmail.com, 34589@debbugs.gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 30 20:31:16 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsj-0007Tx-Gi for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:31:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47556 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsh-00022f-5C for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:31:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37332) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsY-000229-EI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:49785) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsY-000097-2s for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:31:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsX-00065L-UQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:31:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:31:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34589 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 34589-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34589.160149065623379 (code B ref 34589); Wed, 30 Sep 2020 18:31:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34589) by debbugs.gnu.org; 30 Sep 2020 18:30:56 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33098 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsR-000651-Ny for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:30:56 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:58726) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsP-00064k-D4 for 34589@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:30:54 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:41210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsJ-00008b-Ox; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:30:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3317 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kNgsJ-0000YD-6B; Wed, 30 Sep 2020 14:30:47 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87v9fvyw6f.fsf@gnus.org> (message from Lars Ingebrigtsen on Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:08:24 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:189419 Archived-At: > From: Lars Ingebrigtsen > Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 20:08:24 +0200 > Cc: 34589@debbugs.gnu.org > > Gustaf Waldemarson writes: > > > After quite some time here, I have finally been able to get the proper > > legal confirmation from Arm to submit patches. As far as I understand > > things, any patch that I submit for Emacs will now have the copyright > > correctly reassigned and should now be usable without any issues. > > Great! Your patch didn't apply cleanly to Emacs 28, so I've respun it > (included below). > > There was unfortunately no followup on this at the time, and I'm not > exactly a gdb expert (cough cough). This is a new feature, so it can only break itself, no? > Could somebody give this a look-over? It looks good to me, but I > haven't tested it. If the OP could propose a simple sequence of commands to try, I could run them and see if I have any comments. Thanks.