unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
Cc: 51049@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#51049: 28.0.50; tool-bar :vert-only property is broken, not documented and of limited use
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2021 19:32:54 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <837deq2jwp.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADwFkm=W9MvA=Ho72MzE6XDVSGDNWLD=rkGQ-Q8oPJt+i_SXKg@mail.gmail.com> (message from Stefan Kangas on Tue, 5 Oct 2021 19:57:51 -0400)

> From: Stefan Kangas <stefan@marxist.se>
> Date: Tue, 5 Oct 2021 19:57:51 -0400
> 
> According to commit d2bd51898e4 the :vert-only property for toolbar
> items is supposed to be "for tool bar items with labels not shown
> horizontally".
> 
> These properties are used in some places in our sources, but are not
> documented in (info "(elisp) Tool Bar").
> 
> They also don't seem to be working, at least not in GTK:
> 
>   0. emacs -Q
>   1. (custom-set-variables '(tool-bar-position 'left))
>   2. M-x mpc RET
> 
>   (Note that the entire tool-bar in mpc.el has the :vert-only property.)

I suggest to step with a debugger into update_frame_tool_bar in
gtkutil.c, where this is implemented, and see what's going on there.
The effect of :vert-only is conditioned on other aspects of the tool
bar and its buttons, so it could be that what you see is the feature
working as designed, and you just didn't create the conditions for it
to have the effect.  Jan Djärv, who implemented that, was our X and
GTK expert, so it is hard for me to believe that the code didn't work
at least then (it could have bit-rotten with the newer versions of
GTK, of course).

> I also do wonder if this property is at all useful.  If anything, I
> would like the option to *hide* labels in horizontal mode, as having
> labels makes the toolbar change size when I switch between windows to
> with different major modes.

It's fine to introduce new features, but why remove old ones while at
that?  What is not useful to you could be useful to someone else.

> So should the :vert-only property be documented?  Fixed?  Removed?

Documented, probably -- but then :label should also be documented.
Fixed? not sure what to fix.  Removed? definitely no.





  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-06 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-05 23:57 bug#51049: 28.0.50; tool-bar :vert-only property is broken, not documented and of limited use Stefan Kangas
2021-10-06 16:32 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-10-06 18:10   ` Stefan Kangas
2021-10-06 18:27     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-09-12 10:55 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=837deq2jwp.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=51049@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=stefan@marxist.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).