From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63311: 30.0.50; [PATCH] smtpmail-send-it split Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:28:33 +0300 Message-ID: <837ctf575q.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87jzxmsyyr.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83ttwqhahy.fsf@gnu.org> <874joq34bk.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <83o7mygevr.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn1hzv9j.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> <871qjoe7cw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="31891"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63311@debbugs.gnu.org To: Manuel Giraud Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 11 15:28:26 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1px6LJ-00083m-1D for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 15:28:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6L2-0000nD-5t; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:28:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6Kz-0000n3-AN for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:28:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6Kw-0003mW-9T for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:28:04 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px6Kw-0008Fq-4y for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:28:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 13:28:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63311 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch Original-Received: via spool by 63311-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63311.168381165331672 (code B ref 63311); Thu, 11 May 2023 13:28:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63311) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2023 13:27:33 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50062 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px6KT-0008El-5Z for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:27:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39500) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1px6KR-0008EU-7M for 63311@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:27:31 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6KL-0003il-Dw; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:27:25 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=lHzpoiKqdx7uMy6G5XMP32Db7x3jrgTDuv1qnA0wFrw=; b=Yc2Tdp8gGkuy A7aQIm4p6dBXLEvaPRzuLo+hE/dPtwfzVpbdNgusvEteodZ/vAa1yLGBN3ytUfyuxCq4N1KIEHzai h92pJCgKiSI6/H/zh+wBgOkiAGLNEyTE2b19L3kv9Gr05uk8GXMVLT/BxGdzPxXSH2JDZulW8WpKB INXDHwSpSRVbYABQ/2Xg6BEIvIUpcMKkcmzf+3vpPXxGTvtBpEv77uFRLZY6Kqb0JTQ3BCi+LaMb/ hRrRtFJJPLRk/dYs/aN3XTMgsqtyEZk6uHaMRD6lr1osEhmWJZWMflwR9EcNPwWMaZ9L83m9xqRNV BIcwlIw3Nk6ohyAAVsvDCQ==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1px6KK-0002tX-Tm; Thu, 11 May 2023 09:27:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <871qjoe7cw.fsf@ledu-giraud.fr> (message from Manuel Giraud on Wed, 10 May 2023 13:47:11 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:261569 Archived-At: > From: Manuel Giraud > Cc: 63311@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 13:47:11 +0200 > > So I guess, my question is how does one mix Lisp thread with > unwind-protect? I'm not sure I understand why you need to. The two unwind-protect handlers will run at different times and most probably will need to unwind different stuff, although there could be overlap. So why is it a problem to have two separate unwind forms?