From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#63731: [PATCH] Support Emoji Variation Sequence 16 (FE0F) where appropriate Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 19:39:37 +0300 Message-ID: <837csh50dy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87a5xrzsph.fsf@stebalien.com> <87a5xmaqul.fsf@gmail.com> <83r0qxg4q0.fsf@gnu.org> <875y88bhvr.fsf@gmail.com> <83ilc8eapd.fsf@gnu.org> <83edmvcpzl.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn0n9uol.fsf@gmail.com> <83a5xjcgev.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfbb9m4y.fsf@gmail.com> <87o7ly9t6b.fsf@gmail.com> <83edmuax13.fsf@gnu.org> <87fs7a9hl3.fsf@gmail.com> <834jnqaun6.fsf@gnu.org> <878rd29d9u.fsf@gmail.com> <83leh19kec.fsf@gnu.org> <877csijbuv.fsf@gmail.com> <83fs763vez.fsf@gnu.org> <87wn0ihvyj.fsf@gmail.com> <83cz2a3tsl.fsf@gnu.org> <87mt1ehtm7.fsf@gmail.com> <838rcx53cm.fsf@gnu.org> <87ilc1j41b.fsf@gmail.com> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25347"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com To: Robert Pluim Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Jun 05 18:40:25 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFp-0006QM-DP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:40:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFU-0004V3-IC; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:40:04 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFT-0004UW-3Q for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:40:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFS-00047y-Q9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:40:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFS-0004p9-Lf for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:40:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:40:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 63731 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch fixed Original-Received: via spool by 63731-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B63731.168598318818479 (code B ref 63731); Mon, 05 Jun 2023 16:40:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 63731) by debbugs.gnu.org; 5 Jun 2023 16:39:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50255 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFE-0004nz-4P for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:39:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56100) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DFB-0004nm-4b for 63731@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:39:46 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DF5-00040r-Oy; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:39:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnu.org; s=fencepost-gnu-org; h=References:Subject:In-Reply-To:To:From:Date: mime-version; bh=Jpe5T/euCn2TWBMwUoPYyRC9nzd3wADBUI7QOz8i9mc=; b=ne2hwvIM8yp4 IZU6qijeZbWHyaiCGq1YETprqMjJiSO9z9qS7XEeUD7qotpAvPDgO843VPqEoe6eZ1Xi8h1qBHMRT MEFxZLd2sOssK/BCXVl7o2CpnoQ+4wyw8LQfJbo0/9pEj2UM/BmlHyVb98QwcsPTGiHqmfffJupmM 7byzqcvUuaApWNzHcvkKD0Ru1rvnlef9R0y/AsQ2DzLriE0YvG2H4RuaxuJ+nYJFGoMWI2KjADEPY AnN1EQlW3+XmkVoTwscJFFeNZ207gIPUWgXGS0QF+IkAV1PGctUiPF4njHFNQORFRILmVig6cIbHp X8NR9RhRF8z19SHEbXtzOg==; Original-Received: from [87.69.77.57] (helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1q6DF5-0003zk-8u; Mon, 05 Jun 2023 12:39:39 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87ilc1j41b.fsf@gmail.com> (message from Robert Pluim on Mon, 05 Jun 2023 17:57:04 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:263023 Archived-At: > From: Robert Pluim > Cc: 63731@debbugs.gnu.org, steven@stebalien.com > Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2023 17:57:04 +0200 > > >>>>> On Mon, 05 Jun 2023 18:35:37 +0300, Eli Zaretskii said: > > Eli> Which forward rules would conflict with a backward rule triggered by > Eli> U+FE0E? > > All the ones for the non-emoji codepoints that still need to be > composed as emoji sometimes, eg U+261D: > > "\N{U+261D}" > "\N{U+261D}\N{U+1F3FB}" > "\N{U+261D}\N{U+1F3FC}" > "\N{U+261D}\N{U+1F3FD}" > "\N{U+261D}\N{U+1F3FE}" > "\N{U+261D}\N{U+1F3FF}" Couldn't we put these in the slots of #x1F3FB..#x1F3FF instead, as backward rules? As long as we don't have a forward rule starting with #x261D, we could have backward rules for it triggered by #x1F3Fx and #xFE0x, right?