From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#8874: Redisplay confusion in Info, due to recentering fix Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:03:22 +0300 Message-ID: <8362o5x7lx.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87sjrag7zp.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83d3idydxn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1308294689 18726 80.91.229.12 (17 Jun 2011 07:11:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@stupidchicken.com, 8874@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 17 09:11:25 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXTDA-0001BV-Vb for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 09:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53716 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXTDA-0001aN-1A for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:11:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:56796) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT80-0000rb-V0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:06:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT7z-0004sn-DR for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:06:04 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:59643) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT7z-0004si-4r for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:06:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT7y-0000om-Er; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:06:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: owner@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:06:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 8874 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 8874-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B8874.13082943323106 (code B ref 8874); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 07:06:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 8874) by debbugs.gnu.org; 17 Jun 2011 07:05:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT7T-0000o2-VO for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:05:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QXT7R-0000np-MX for 8874@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:05:31 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LMX00600ACX5900@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 8874@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:05:23 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.126.164.125]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LMX006NEACX4V00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:05:23 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 03:06:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:47256 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: Chong Yidong , 8874@debbugs.gnu.org > Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 22:58:57 -0400 > > > bidi reordering of display strings, and we enter code freeze? > > Feature freeze is close, but code freeze is still far. So is it a yes or a no to my question?