From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#9794: 24.0.90; `format-time-string' no good for %Z Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:33:29 +0200 Message-ID: <8362jlv0rq.fsf@gnu.org> References: <68A313A7DDAA4912A255DAFE495606F9@us.oracle.com> <24FDB65B0E784E978085D30A7CBF9FAF@us.oracle.com> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319013257 28867 80.91.229.12 (19 Oct 2011 08:34:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 9794@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 19 10:34:13 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRbG-0005ch-Bw for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:34:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46530 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRbF-0006kk-EY for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:34295) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRbB-0006kF-Nc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRb7-0004pr-Aj for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:05 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:54451) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRb7-0004pg-8g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRc6-0000kQ-0M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:35:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:35:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 9794 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 9794-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B9794.13190132792840 (code B ref 9794); Wed, 19 Oct 2011 08:35:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 9794) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Oct 2011 08:34:39 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRbj-0000jl-Fj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout21.012.net.il ([80.179.55.169]) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RGRbg-0000jY-JK for 9794@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:34:38 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout21.012.net.il by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0LTB00F000V7B200@a-mtaout21.012.net.il> for 9794@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:33:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([77.124.212.197]) by a-mtaout21.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0LTB00FSP13R1X80@a-mtaout21.012.net.il>; Wed, 19 Oct 2011 10:33:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <24FDB65B0E784E978085D30A7CBF9FAF@us.oracle.com> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.11 Precedence: list Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 04:35:02 -0400 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:52838 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 00:43:28 -0700 > > And just because a non-Windows developer thinks that letting them > see "(Pacific Daylight Time)" is not useful to them and "()" is more > meaningful. Sheesh. No, it's because a _Windows_ developer found out that the Windows time-zone names violate international standards for what %Z should produce, which breaks other Emacs features that use the results.