From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#12745: crash in bidi_pop_it during (idle) redisplay Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: <83624wt247.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1353707798 2832 80.91.229.3 (23 Nov 2012 21:56:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: alptekin.aker@gmail.com, 12745@debbugs.gnu.org To: Ami Fischman Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 23 22:56:49 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Ev-0004T1-5L for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 22:56:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56955 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Ek-00072I-Jf for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:56:38 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58824) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Eh-000721-Ur for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:56:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Eg-0000jO-GQ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:56:35 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53323) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Eg-0000jJ-Ch for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:56:34 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1G5-0004Ef-VA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:58:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:58:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 12745 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 12745-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B12745.135370787316263 (code B ref 12745); Fri, 23 Nov 2012 21:58:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 12745) by debbugs.gnu.org; 23 Nov 2012 21:57:53 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35341 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Fw-0004EG-MS for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:57:52 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:64965) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Tc1Fu-0004E8-HK for 12745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:57:51 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MDY00600MXQTA00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 12745@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:56:21 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MDY006E6NLWNJ80@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 23 Nov 2012 23:56:21 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:67377 Archived-At: > Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2012 12:14:27 -0800 > From: Ami Fischman > Cc: Alp Aker , 12745@debbugs.gnu.org > > This morning I had the first crash since updating to > d7ef9678754509d426df5f6f2086ca03f7d68b1c on trunk (which doesn't include > 110767's fix to init_from_display_pos) If you don't have 110767, then why is it interesting to report this crash? That revision was supposed to fix precisely this crash. The current revision numbers on the emacs-24 branch and on the trunk are 110941 and 110993, respectively. So why would you use such an old version, from more than 3 weeks ago? > Let me know if you think this is worth debugging further or if I should > first sync & rebuild before a further crash will be interesting. I certainly recommend to update to the latest code. Thanks.