From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13292: 24.3.50; wrong sytax description in (elisp) Case Tables Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:30:34 +0200 Message-ID: <83623mm3lh.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83a9sym8q8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1356719483 9705 80.91.229.3 (28 Dec 2012 18:31:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13292-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 28 19:31:38 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ToeiV-0001WU-8i for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:31:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49010 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ToeiG-0002vy-LU for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50266) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Toei9-0002va-4n for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Toei4-0003r2-F6 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:13 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:53064) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Toei4-0003qv-BC for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:08 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Toeiw-0000Qj-0t for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:32:02 -0500 Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-To: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:32:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: cc-closed 13292 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Mail-Followup-To: 13292@debbugs.gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com Original-Received: via spool by 13292-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D13292.13567194861592 (code D ref 13292); Fri, 28 Dec 2012 18:32:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13292-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 28 Dec 2012 18:31:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35079 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToeiM-0000Pb-B6 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:42225) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ToeiJ-0000PS-GF for 13292-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 13:31:25 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MFR00B007EIXV00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 13292-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:30:27 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MFR00B567ERL4B0@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Fri, 28 Dec 2012 20:30:27 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:69110 Archived-At: > From: "Drew Adams" > Cc: <13292@debbugs.gnu.org> > Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 08:57:28 -0800 > > > > The parameters should be uppercase everywhere. > > > > They never were. This is how Info works. > > Closing. > > In that case, there are bugs in the other direction, in other nodes of the > manual - nodes that use uppercase for parameters. > > For example: > > `A Sample Function Description' - `count-loop' > `Syntax Table Functions' - `with-syntax-table' > `Using Lexical Binding' - `special-variable-p' > `Syntax Table Internals' - `string-to-syntax' > `Declare Form' - `declare' > > Note that `A Sample Function Description' is the very place where we explain the > syntax convention and give an example of it. Not a good place to set a bad > example. It's not bad. This is done on purpose, see the Texinfo sources, which use @var in this case. > Reopening. There is clearly some cleanup to be done. Reclosing. Please stop this ridicule.