From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#13850: Emacs for Windows: Launch better from a command prompt Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:59:24 +0200 Message-ID: <836219vodv.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83k3pquuqy.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362236405 27774 80.91.229.3 (2 Mar 2013 15:00:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 15:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 13850@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andrew Pennebaker Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Mar 02 16:00:29 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnvG-0005TQ-Kh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:00:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57922 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnuv-00041Y-I7 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:00:05 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnuq-000401-S8 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:00:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnup-0000C3-AG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:51434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnup-0000Ao-6g for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:59:59 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnus-0006iA-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:00:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 13850 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs,w32 X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 13850-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B13850.136223640025764 (code B ref 13850); Sat, 02 Mar 2013 15:00:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 13850) by debbugs.gnu.org; 2 Mar 2013 15:00:00 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55543 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnup-0006hU-Eq for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 10:00:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:41319) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1UBnum-0006hF-2e for 13850@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 09:59:57 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MJ100F00G27UZ00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 13850@debbugs.gnu.org; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:59:37 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MJ100FW5GBCOF40@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Sat, 02 Mar 2013 16:59:37 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:72028 Archived-At: > Date: Sat, 2 Mar 2013 09:43:14 -0500 > From: Andrew Pennebaker > > Would it make sense to give runemacs a -nw option, and rename it emacs.exe? No, because runemacs.exe works by invoking emacs.exe in a special way. If you rename it, it will reinvoke itself. Why is the current arrangement a problem?