From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#15962: 24.3.50; emacs_backtrace.txt Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:49:15 +0200 Message-ID: <8361rdaiyc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <0691bec9-b582-4681-8245-ee3d05225485@default> <0abd6b16-9da4-46db-bc2d-e35ec6808ed8@default> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1385571013 6337 80.91.229.3 (27 Nov 2013 16:50:13 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:50:13 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 27 17:50:18 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJd-0007Yv-5F for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 17:50:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36753 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJc-0006xG-RA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:50:16 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51837) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJU-0006wn-QB for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJP-0003C3-Lc for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:50:08 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:33892) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJP-0003Az-JZ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:50:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VliJO-0006tD-R7 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:50:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:50:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 15962 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo Original-Received: via spool by 15962-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B15962.138557096626425 (code B ref 15962); Wed, 27 Nov 2013 16:50:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 15962) by debbugs.gnu.org; 27 Nov 2013 16:49:26 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47911 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VliIo-0006s9-0O for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:49:26 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:53640) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VliIk-0006rs-UF for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 11:49:23 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MWX00K00LDYS300@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 15962@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:49:16 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MWX00KEILE3GDA0@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Wed, 27 Nov 2013 18:49:16 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: <0abd6b16-9da4-46db-bc2d-e35ec6808ed8@default> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81033 Archived-At: > Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 07:59:30 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > Cc: 15962@debbugs.gnu.org > > Actually, I just noticed the emacs_backtrace.txt that is attached. > It was created at 19:25 yesterday. > > I don't recall another crash since the one I reported below, so > I'm guessing that perhaps I had just looked at the beginning of > the file before and saw that it looked the same. In fact, this backtrace is much longer, even though it starts out the same. > Maybe it will be more useful? Unfortunately, it's one more backtrace whose contents doesn't make any sense. Thanks anyway.