From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16099: closed (Re: bug#16099: 24.3.50; Build failure, undefined function `cl-member') Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:13:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8361qwy3p5.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386699259 6218 80.91.229.3 (10 Dec 2013 18:14:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:14:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16099@debbugs.gnu.org To: Richard Copley Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 10 19:14:24 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRp7-0007NA-Co for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 19:14:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50731 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRp6-0000yG-Ty for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:14:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRow-0000lt-2l for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:14:16 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRop-0006Z4-Vm for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:14:09 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:56274) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRop-0006Yy-SO for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:14:03 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRop-0001we-LF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:14:03 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:14:03 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16099 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: moreinfo unreproducible Original-Received: via spool by 16099-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B16099.13866992097403 (code B ref 16099); Tue, 10 Dec 2013 18:14:03 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16099) by debbugs.gnu.org; 10 Dec 2013 18:13:29 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:42058 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRoG-0001vK-8L for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:13:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout20.012.net.il ([80.179.55.166]:53065) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1VqRoE-0001vA-8o for 16099@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 13:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout20.012.net.il by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MXL00000RWABD00@a-mtaout20.012.net.il> for 16099@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:13:25 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout20.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MXL000UORYD7150@a-mtaout20.012.net.il>; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 20:13:25 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:81694 Archived-At: > Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 17:42:56 +0000 > From: Richard Copley > Cc: 16099@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > > From: Glenn Morris > > I'm confident bootstrap will work for you. > We can reopen this if it does not. > > Thanks for your help. So do I now need to be using "make bootstrap" instead > of "make"? No, not the first time you build in a fresh checkout.