From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#16431: 24.3.50; `follow-adjust-windows' sometimes fails (patch included) Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: <8361pj3j5h.fsf@gnu.org> References: Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389895070 29379 80.91.229.3 (16 Jan 2014 17:57:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 16431-done@debbugs.gnu.org, andlind@gmail.com To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 16 18:57:54 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rCT-0000ET-Uv for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 18:57:54 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34327 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rCT-0007ja-Lh for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:57:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36691) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rBj-0006cz-MX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:57:12 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rBe-0006OB-IS for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:57:07 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.43]:39919) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rBe-0006O2-FJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:57:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rBe-0008C1-6i for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:57:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:57:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 16431 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 16431-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D16431.138989499231426 (code D ref 16431); Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:57:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 16431-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2014 17:56:32 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53938 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rBA-0008Ao-26 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:56:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mtaout22.012.net.il ([80.179.55.172]:36711) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1W3rB7-0008Ad-2f for 16431-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 12:56:29 -0500 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.a-mtaout22.012.net.il by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0MZI007009R6TX00@a-mtaout22.012.net.il> for 16431-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:56:28 +0200 (IST) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([87.69.4.28]) by a-mtaout22.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0MZI0074O9U3Q330@a-mtaout22.012.net.il>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 19:56:28 +0200 (IST) In-reply-to: X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 140.186.70.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:83606 Archived-At: > From: Stefan Monnier > Cc: 16431-done@debbugs.gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii > Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:25:46 -0500 > > My intention would be for redisplay-window to only update the matrices > (i.e. the internal representation of the rendered window) and let the > subsequent full redisplay deal with updating the display. But if we mark the windows as up-to-date, then subsequent redisplay will see that and decide that it has nothing to do.