From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Keith David Bershatsky <esq@lawlist.com>
Cc: 19684@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19684: 25.0.50; `this-command` is set to `nil` before `window-scroll-functions` hook runs.
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8361buswn3.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m2ppa3xr6z.wl%esq@lawlist.com>
> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 23:19:48 -0800
> From: Keith David Bershatsky <esq@lawlist.com>
>
> To the extent that a user wishes to use the value of `this-command` within a
> function attached to the `window-scroll-functions` hook, a workaround is needed
> because the default value is `nil`. In other words, something at the C source
> code level is setting the value to `nil` before the `window-scroll-functions`
> hook runs.
That "something" is the command loop itself: it resets 'this-command'
when the command finishes and returns to the loop.
Recall that in Emacs, execution of commands running the Lisp
interpreter is separated from redisplay: the latter runs when Emacs is
idle and is waiting for input. Since most of the calls to
window-scroll-functions are made by the display engine, the command
already returned to the command loop by that time.
> Calling `redisplay` somehow prevents `this-command` from being reset
> to `nil`
I hope it is now clear why this happens: in this scenario redisplay is
entered before the command finishes, so 'this-command' was still not
reset.
> The most reliable test I have discovered to pinpoint when the
> `window-scroll-functions` hook will activate is by having the following code
> within a function attached to the `post-command-hook`:
> (pos-visible-in-window-p (point) (get-buffer-window (current-buffer)
> (selected-frame))). If the result is `t`, then the `window-scroll-functions`
> hook will be activating.
You are well-advised not to depend on such implementation details.
> Although this bug report has been submitted with Emacs Trunk from October 1,
> 2014; the behavior is the same with Emacs Trunk built on January 1, 2015.
Emacs always behaved like that. And it's not a bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-25 15:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-25 7:19 bug#19684: 25.0.50; `this-command` is set to `nil` before `window-scroll-functions` hook runs Keith David Bershatsky
2015-01-25 10:38 ` martin rudalics
2015-01-25 15:33 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2015-01-25 16:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2015-01-25 17:42 ` Keith David Bershatsky
2019-10-01 20:16 ` Stefan Kangas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8361buswn3.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=19684@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=esq@lawlist.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).