From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#21521: 24.5; pdb default suggested command Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:54:25 +0300 Message-ID: <836132nb2m.fsf@gnu.org> References: <9B98B608-8793-4666-8D1C-E31FFF4F9F1A@pacifico.cc> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442908527 32319 80.91.229.3 (22 Sep 2015 07:55:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 21521@debbugs.gnu.org To: Stefano Pacifico Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 22 09:55:16 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPz-0003jW-7M for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 09:55:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37461 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPy-0004lZ-Dz for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:55:14 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPq-0004hf-SJ for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:55:12 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPn-00063O-IP for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:55:06 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48975) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPn-00062t-EI for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:55:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPn-0006Zf-3G for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:55:03 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:55:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 21521 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 21521-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B21521.144290846525175 (code B ref 21521); Tue, 22 Sep 2015 07:55:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 21521) by debbugs.gnu.org; 22 Sep 2015 07:54:25 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:41185 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIPA-0006Xz-Nj for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:54:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mtaout26.012.net.il ([80.179.55.182]:35377) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ZeIP6-0006Xg-8p for 21521@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 03:54:21 -0400 Original-Received: from conversion-daemon.mtaout26.012.net.il by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) id <0NV200300JCDRY00@mtaout26.012.net.il> for 21521@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:56:55 +0300 (IDT) Original-Received: from HOME-C4E4A596F7 ([84.94.185.246]) by mtaout26.012.net.il (HyperSendmail v2007.08) with ESMTPA id <0NV2000HUJEV8O20@mtaout26.012.net.il>; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:56:55 +0300 (IDT) In-reply-to: <9B98B608-8793-4666-8D1C-E31FFF4F9F1A@pacifico.cc> X-012-Sender: halo1@inter.net.il X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:106801 Archived-At: > From: Stefano Pacifico > Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2015 22:16:53 -0400 > > It seems from reading the code in `gud.el` that the system assumes that the Emacs function/mode (`pdb` in this case) corresponds to the name of the executable to invoke to perform the debugging, which is not necessarily the case for `pdb`. Why isn't that the case for 'pdb'?