From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#33375: 27.0.50; Nested function definitions Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:40:12 +0200 Message-ID: <835zwz8y77.fsf@gnu.org> References: <3de36fb2-d7e6-347e-79ec-c38950aca174@easy-emacs.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1542209949 24813 195.159.176.226 (14 Nov 2018 15:39:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:39:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 33375@debbugs.gnu.org To: Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 14 16:39:05 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxFw-0006KO-L8 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 16:39:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32834 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxI2-0002Fr-SA for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:41:14 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57296) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHt-0002Eu-MG for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:41:06 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHq-0004FT-Ij for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:41:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:48160) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHq-0004ET-FF for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:41:02 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHq-0001B0-6K for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:41:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:41:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 33375 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: Original-Received: via spool by 33375-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B33375.15422100374485 (code B ref 33375); Wed, 14 Nov 2018 15:41:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 33375) by debbugs.gnu.org; 14 Nov 2018 15:40:37 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52418 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHR-0001AH-2U for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:40:37 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47523) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHP-0001A3-Hi for 33375@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:40:35 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHF-0003Ur-RZ for 33375@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:40:30 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:39302) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxHC-0003Rm-PV; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:40:23 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=1436 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gMxH5-0003lg-R8; Wed, 14 Nov 2018 10:40:20 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Andreas =?UTF-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= on Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:06:52 +0100) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 208.118.235.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:152385 Archived-At: > From: Andreas Röhler > Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 11:06:52 +0100 > > (defun foo1 () > "[Some docu] > > (defun other-foo " > (interactive) > ;; defining another function inside > (defun foo2 () > (interactive) > (message "%s" "Foo2") > ;; another syntactically correct function just badly indented > (defun foo3 () > (interactive) > (message "%s" "Foo3")) > ) > (message "%s" "Foo1")) > > ;;;; > Results of evaluation: > > (foo1) ==> "Foo1" > (foo2) ==> foo3 ? > (foo3) ==> "Foo3" Why do you think there's anything wrong here? AFAICT, each evaluation returns the last sexp evaluated in the respective function. foo1 and foo3 have a call to 'message' as the last sexp, so they return the message string, but foo2's last sexp evaluates a defun form, so you get the result of that, which is the function foo3. IMO, this is expected and correct behavior.