From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#34117: 26.1; Incorrect byte-compile warnings Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 10:39:24 +0200 Message-ID: <835zumcqbn.fsf@gnu.org> References: <172346c1-8bd6-4b26-b55f-acc83aede737@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1547800690 17914 195.159.176.226 (18 Jan 2019 08:38:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Cc: 34117@debbugs.gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 18 09:38:06 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPfB-0004PB-IH for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 09:38:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:34442 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPhD-0006Go-O6 for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:40:11 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:55952) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPh7-0006Gj-9u for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPh6-00010I-PA for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:40:05 -0500 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:36366) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPh6-0000zF-Li for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPh4-0004PF-0Z for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:40:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:40:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 34117 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs X-GNU-PR-Keywords: notabug wontfix Original-Received: via spool by 34117-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B34117.154780078816914 (code B ref 34117); Fri, 18 Jan 2019 08:40:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 34117) by debbugs.gnu.org; 18 Jan 2019 08:39:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35647 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPgq-0004Ok-6m for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:39:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:45631) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPgo-0004OX-OE for 34117@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:39:46 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:45947) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPgh-0000RL-RH; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:39:40 -0500 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=3970 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1gkPgV-0008IG-0q; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 03:39:28 -0500 In-reply-to: (message from Drew Adams on Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:46:16 -0800 (PST)) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 209.51.188.43 X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.bugs:154543 Archived-At: > Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 16:46:16 -0800 (PST) > From: Drew Adams > > The warning message is incorrect, inaccurate. >From my POV, that warning does the job we wanted it to do. So this is not a bug, IMO.