From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#40990: Improve message-mode and isearch icons Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 05:35:02 +0300 Message-ID: <835zd3ci7d.fsf@gnu.org> References: <83ees4w562.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv0zvey3.fsf@gnu.org> <45991686-81b4-a27d-6367-f01bbc20ab10@yandex.ru> <838siavor9.fsf@gnu.org> <3e8277b7-c3dd-56e9-4b40-b817aae264d4@yandex.ru> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="99762"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 11 04:37:53 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyKH-000PrP-AP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 11 May 2020 04:37:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:52442 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyKG-0008D7-BF for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:37:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37492) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyIV-0005yu-2M for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:36:03 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:39287) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyIU-0005L6-LD for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:36:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyIU-0004bm-J0 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:36:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 02:36:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 40990 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org id=D40990.158916451617640 (code D ref 40990); Mon, 11 May 2020 02:36:02 +0000 Original-Received: (at 40990-done) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 May 2020 02:35:16 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50833 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyHk-0004aS-Aw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:35:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33978) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyHj-0004aD-BX for 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:35:15 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:54422) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyHd-0001BY-Tv; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:35:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2799 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jXyHc-000103-Ix; Sun, 10 May 2020 22:35:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <3e8277b7-c3dd-56e9-4b40-b817aae264d4@yandex.ru> (message from Dmitry Gutov on Mon, 11 May 2020 04:42:32 +0300) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180047 Archived-At: > Cc: 40990-done@debbugs.gnu.org > From: Dmitry Gutov > Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 04:42:32 +0300 > > > The only way to speed up our releases that I see is to care less about > > stability and regressions. If you are following the bug list closely, > > you will see that we just recently started to get reports about > > significant regressions in Emacs 27 (and some in Emacs 26). Should we > > disregard them? We never did that, not since Emacs 25, at least. > > I don't know what's the best course of action in each case, but if we > did make a point of releasing more often (e.g. did time-based releases, > for instance), Emacs 27.1 would probably have been less stable. But it > would have been released maybe a year ago, and by now we'd already have > released, say, 27.2 and 27.3, with more regressions fixed and faster > because of exposure to a wider audience, more testing. > > It's a tricky road, but a possible one. You are just listing the advantages of releasing frequently. No one will argue with that, the problem is how to make that happen without hurting stability.