From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Eli Zaretskii Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.bugs Subject: bug#39972: 28.0.50; which-function no longer returning current Java method in Emacs 27 Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 19:15:42 +0300 Message-ID: <835zcp5knl.fsf@gnu.org> References: <20200308113302.43082.qmail@mail.muc.de> <20200520191303.GA19762@ACM> Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="99450"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: acm@muc.de, 39972@debbugs.gnu.org To: Philipp Stephani Original-X-From: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu May 21 18:16:34 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jbns2-000PmG-IP for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 18:16:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43376 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbns1-0002HS-KQ for geb-bug-gnu-emacs@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:16:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46814) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrW-0001vN-FX for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:45614) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrW-0000q1-58 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:16:02 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrV-0006c1-W9 for bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:16:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Resent-From: Eli Zaretskii Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 16:16:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39972 X-GNU-PR-Package: emacs Original-Received: via spool by 39972-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39972.159007774825393 (code B ref 39972); Thu, 21 May 2020 16:16:01 +0000 Original-Received: (at 39972) by debbugs.gnu.org; 21 May 2020 16:15:48 +0000 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57160 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrH-0006bV-Q9 for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:15:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39364) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrG-0006bJ-Sp for 39972@debbugs.gnu.org; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:15:47 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:47034) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrB-0000fU-C8; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:15:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [176.228.60.248] (port=2846 helo=home-c4e4a596f7) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1jbnrA-0003Od-RM; Thu, 21 May 2020 12:15:41 -0400 In-Reply-To: (message from Philipp Stephani on Thu, 21 May 2020 17:56:16 +0200) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org List-Id: "Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-gnu-emacs-bounces+geb-bug-gnu-emacs=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "bug-gnu-emacs" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.bugs:180707 Archived-At: > From: Philipp Stephani > Date: Thu, 21 May 2020 17:56:16 +0200 > Cc: 39972@debbugs.gnu.org > > Do you think you could push these patches onto the release branch, as > this appears to be a regression? The fixes (especially the one for which-func) are too risky for the release branch. Is it possible to come up with something simpler for emacs-27? What change(s) caused the regression, exactly?